Bail application under Section 439 CrPC by an applicant accused of sexual assault on a minor girl. The court expressed disinclination to grant bail after perusing investigation papers, whereupon the applicant withdrew the application, which was disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
2024:BHC-NAG:8687
29.ba.310.24.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (BA) NO.310 OF 2024
(Pawan s/o Purushottam Gedam Vs. The State of Maharashtra and anr.)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order
Coram, appearances, Court's Orders
or directions and Registrar's order
Mr. B. Dafle, Advocate for the applicant.
Mr. N.B. Jawade, APP for the State.
Ms A.D. Kolhe, Advocate (appointed) for non-applicant No.2.
CORAM:- URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J. DATED :- AUGUST 6, 2024
The application is for grant of bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.)
*Divya
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pawan s/o Purushottam Gedam
The State of Maharashtra
Non-applicant No.2
Urmila Joshi-Phalke
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
