Parties to a criminal appeal informed the court they had amicably settled the dispute. The appellant sought leave to withdraw the appeal, which was granted, and the appeal was disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-NAG:8517
04.apeal.555.21.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.555 OF 2021
(Sanjay Ramesh Kadu Vs. Sunil Kamlakar Raut)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order
Mr. M.N. Ali, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. R.A. Bhandakkar, Advocate for the respondent.
CORAM:- URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J. DATED :- AUGUST 5, 2024.
Learned Counsel for the appellant and learned Counsel for the respondent both have submitted that the parties have amicably settled the dispute, and therefore, the appellant does not want to proceed with the appeal.
(URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.)
*Divya
Sanjay Ramesh Kadu
Sunil Kamlakar Raut
Urmila Joshi-Phalke
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
