Bail application under Section 439 CrPC in a case of attempt to murder and related offences was rejected. The informant identified the applicant with a specific role; injuries though simple were on a vital part, and material showed intention. Pointed discrepancies did not entitle the applicant to bail given the offence's seriousness.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
4-ba-3089-2024.doc
NIKITA KAILAS DARADE Digitally signed byNIKITA KAILASDARADE Date: 2024.10.1418:42:40 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO.3089 OF 2024
Arvind Krushna Guhagarkar ... Applicant V/s. State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Mr. Madhusudan Pareek for the Applicant. Mr. P. H. Gaikwad, APP for the State.
CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR, J.
DATE : 11th OCTOBER, 2024.
PC:
1 of 2
Nikita
4-ba-3089-2024.doc
that the story is concocted one and applicant has been falsely implicated in the offence.
(ANIL S. KILOR, J)
2 of 2
Nikita
1 issue framed by the court
Whether discrepancies in the pancha request letter and recovery entitled the applicant to bail under Section 439 CrPC for offences including Section 307 IPC.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Arvind Krushna Guhagarkar
State of Maharashtra
Anil S. Kilor
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
