Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Dilip Atmaram Upadhyay vs the State of Maharashtra — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2024)

Home
Bombay HC
2024
Dilip Atmaram Upadhyay vs the State of MaharashtraDilip Atmaram Upadhyay v. the State of Maharashtra

Dismissed

Dilip Atmaram Upadhyay v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC20 Aug 2024BA/3047/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application by the applicant was not pressed; leave sought to withdraw the application and granted. Application dismissed as withdrawn.

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Dismissed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

A one-line procedural order: the applicant's counsel sought and obtained leave to withdraw the bail application, which stands dismissed as withdrawn. The Court decided nothing of general application.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

A

SMITA Digitally signed by SMITA JOHNSON JOHNSON GONSALVESDate: 2024.08.27 GONSALVES 17:39:32 +0530

502.ba3047-24.doc

sg

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

BAIL APPLICATION NO.3047 OF 2024

... Dilip Atmaram Upadhyay Applicant v/s. State of Maharashtra ... Respondent

Ms Savvy Kolhekar, i/b. Aniket Vagal, for the Applicant.

Mr Arfan Sait, APP, for Respondent State.

Coram : R.N. Laddha, J.

Date : 27 August 2024

P.C. :

. Not on board. Taken on board.

Ms Savvy Kolhekar, the learned Counsel for the applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this application. Leave granted as prayed for.

The application stands dismissed as withdrawn.

Page 1 of 1

27 August 2024

Parties & counsel

AI extract

applicant
Dilip Atmaram Upadhyay
respondent
State of Maharashtra

Coram

AI extract

R.N. Laddha

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Bombay HC
Decided on: 20 Aug 2024 · August
Registered: 25 Jul 2024
Case no.: BA/3047/2024
CNR: HCBM010365202024
Topic: Bail and Remand
Bench: R. N. Laddha
Disposal: Dismissed as Withdrawn

All orders in this case

2 orders share this CNR

20 Aug 2024Order 1 — this page · R. N. Laddha
27 Aug 2024Order 2 · R. N. Laddha

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from R. N. Laddha

Dipti Suresh Mane Vs the State of Maharashtra
19 Aug 2024
Vrushali Vijay Panchal vs State of Maharashtra
19 Aug 2024
Dilip Kalyanji Shah vs State of Maharashtra
19 Aug 2024
Kalpana Ranjit Gaikar vs State of Maharashtra
20 Aug 2024
Darshan Bharat Kumar Chudgar vs State of Maharashtra
20 Aug 2024
Mohammed Sher Sharif Khan vs Union of India and Anr.
20 Aug 2024

Cite this judgement

Dilip Atmaram Upadhyay v. the State of Maharashtra, BA/3047/2024 (BOM), decided on 20 August 2024.

The Bombay High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

R.N. Laddha

Parties & counsel