Bail application for murder offence based on circumstantial CCTV evidence showing deceased last seen with applicant. Despite trial delay since December 2022, court found sufficient incriminating material and rejected bail, granting liberty to reapply after one year if trial makes no progress.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
14-BA-2981-2024.DOC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2981 OF 2024
Balvindar Sada Singh … Applicant vs. State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Mr. Priyal G. Sarda, Advocate for Applicant.
Mr. Pankaj P. Deokar, APP for State-Respondent.
CORAM:- ANIL S. KILOR, J.
DATED:- 1st OCTOBER 2024
1/2
Ganesh
14-BA-2981-2024.DOC
that there is sufficient circumstantial evidence available on record against the Applicant, namely CCTV footage, from where it can be seen that deceased was last seen with the Applicant. There are two CCTV footages, which supports the case of the prosecution.
[ANIL S. KILOR, J.]
Digitally
signed by
GANESH
GANESH SUBHASH
SUBHASH LOKHANDE
LOKHANDE Date:
2024.10.03
19:19:26
+0530
2/2
Ganesh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant should be granted bail under Section 439 CrPC in a murder case despite delay in framing of charge and trial not concluding within six months.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Balvindar Sada Singh
State of Maharashtra
Anil S. Kilor
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
