Jagannath Shankar Pawar v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCBA/2507/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Bail application adjourned to allow the High Court Legal Services Committee, Mumbai two more weeks to appoint a panel advocate to represent respondent No. 2.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
30-BA-2507-24.DOC
¶2
Sayali Upasani
¶3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
¶4
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2507 OF 2024
¶5
Jagannath Shankar Pawar ...Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Others ...Respondents
¶6
Mr. Rupesh A. Zade, Advocate for Applicant. Ms. S. M. Yadav, APP for State-Respondent.
¶7
CORAM:- ANIL S. KILOR, J.
¶8
DATED:- 18th NOVEMBER, 2024
¶9
PC:-
¶10
- Despite the order dated 21st October, 2024, no one is appointed by the High Court Legal Services Committee, Mumbai.
¶11
- Two weeks more time is granted to the High Court Legal Services Committee, Mumbai to appoint an Advocate from its panel to represent and espouse the cause of the respondent No. 2.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Jagannath Shankar Pawar
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
- respondent
Respondent No. 2
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
12 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Chief Executive Officer, Zp, Nagpur Vs Charandas Bidur Bakasare Died Thr. Lrs Parobai C Bakasare
Shrikrushna Sampatrao Saratkar and Others Vs Shri Ganpati Mandir Sansthan, Kandali, Thr. Its President/Panchkameti and Others
Jagdishprasad Bhagwandin Choudhary and Others vs Shrikrishna Narayanrao Pande and Others
Yogesh Prakash Thorat vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.