Bail application in a criminal case was withdrawn after the applicant's counsel sought permission when the Court inclined to dismiss it. Trial had commenced; the Court directed the trial court to expedite and complete the trial within nine months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
13_BA_2375_24.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2375 OF 2024
| Sahid Mohammad Ramzan Hasmi vs. |
… | Applicant |
|---|---|---|
| The State of Maharashtra and another | … | Respondents |
Mr. A. R. Bukhari for applicant.
Mr. Prasanna P. Malshe, APP for respondent No.1-State.
CORAM : MANISH PITALE, J. DATE : 14th OCTOBER, 2024
P.C. :
. After having argued for some time and when this Court was inclined to dismiss the application, the learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions, sought permission to withdraw the application.
(MANISH PITALE, J)
PRIYAKAMBLI Digitallysigned byPRIYA KAMBLIDate:2024.10.1419:22:23+0530
Priya Kambli
1/1
Sahid Mohammad Ramzan Hasmi
The State of Maharashtra
Manish Pitale
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
