Sameer Yakub Shaikh v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application where the applicant's counsel sought time to serve a copy on respondent no.2. One week was granted, notice to the respondent/victim was directed to be issued returnable on 27 November 2024, and the APP was to intimate the victim through the police station.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
913.ba.2301.2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.2301 OF 2024
Sameer Yakub Shaikh Applicant versus
- The State of Maharashtra
- XYZ Respondents
Mr.Saransh Sonar i/by Mr.Himanshu Patil for Applicant. Mr.S.S.Chaudhary, APP, for State.
PC :
- Learned counsel for Applicant seeks time to supply copy of application for service to Respondent no.2. Time of one week is granted.
- Upon supply of copy in the registry, the office is directed to issue notice to the Respondent no.2/victim returnable on 27th November 2024.
- In the mean time, learned APP to give intimation to the victim through concerned Police Station.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Sameer Yakub Shaikh
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
- respondent
XYZ
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
12 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Yogita D/O Meghnath Dadmal Vs Dy. Director and Member Secy., the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Amravati and Ors.
Prem S/O. Parashram Rathod Vs the Additional Collector, Yavatmal and Ors.
Nirmala Ramdas Zarkar (Died) Thr. Lrs. Vs Bhavana Kiran Zarkar
Radhikesh Shivaji Pawar vs State of Maharashtra