Sanjay Masu Thengal v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application adjourned for paucity of time; interim orders, if any, continued until the next date.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Board Sr.No.:-0
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 2070 OF 2024
Sanjay Masu Thengal ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....RESPONDENT
CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR J
DATE : 22nd November, 2024
P.C. :
Due to paucity of time, stand over to 29/11/2024. Interim order, if any, to continue till then.
( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )
Page 1/1
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Sanjay Masu Thengal
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
Anil S. Kilor
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
14 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Priya W/O Sonu Gulhane (@ Priya Vijay Mahajan) vs Dwarkadas Kawdamal Katariya
Smt. Nanda Gajanan Pawar vs the Divisional Commissioner, Amravati Division, Amravati and Others
Pramod S/O Dhanraj Raut and Others vs the Dy. Registrar, Co-Operative Societies City - 3, Nagpur and Ors.
Smt. Smrutirekha Prakash Samarth vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Principal Secretary, Mumbai and Another