Mandar Chandrahas Khadilkar v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application notice order: notice issued to Respondent No.2, returnable on a stated date, with directions for the Investigating Officer to inform her of the application and of advocacy options.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
903-BA-07-2024.doc
Arjun
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO.7 OF 2024
Mandar Chandrahas Khadilkar …Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. …Respondents
Ms. Sabiha Ansari a/w Aisha Shaikh & Tanvi Rane i/b Hulyalkar & Associates, for the Applicant.
Mr. P. H. Gaikwad, APP, for the Respondent No.1-State.
CORAM : MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED : FEBRUARY 06, 2024
P.C.:
1. Heard Ms. Ansari, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant and Mr. Gaikwad, learned APP for the Respondent No.1State.
2. Issue notice to the Respondent No.2, returnable on 27th February 2024.
3. The Investigating Officer to intimate Respondent No.2 about the pendency of this Bail Application as well as that she can engage Advocate of her own choice or she can be provided with an Advocate from the High Court Legal Services Committee, Mumbai.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Mandar Chandrahas Khadilkar
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
- respondent
Respondent No.2
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
17 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court