Vitthal Rambhau Sathe v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application adjourned due to paucity of time; interim orders, if any, continued until the next date.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Board Sr.No.:-0
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 1914 OF 2024
Vitthal Rambhau Sathe ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra And Anr ....RESPONDENT
CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR J
DATE : 12th November, 2024
P.C. :
Due to paucity of time, stand over to 18/11/2024. Interim order, if any, to continue till then.
( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )
Page 1/1
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Vitthal Rambhau Sathe
- respondent
The State Of Maharashtra
- respondent
Anr
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
16 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court