Mohammad Sheru Shaikh Maksood v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Applicant sought bail in three FIRs with similar allegations; counsel withdrew applications when dismissal appeared likely.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
bipin prithiani
1
914-ba-1773.24 & ors.doc
BIPIN DHARMENDERPRITHIANI Digitally signed by BIPINDHARMENDER PRITHIANIDate: 2024.07.19 10:34:39 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1773 OF 2024
WITH
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1817 OF 2024 WITH
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1838 OF 2024
Mohammad Sheru Shaikh Maksood … Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
… Respondents
Mr. Niranjan Mundargi a/w Mr. Advait Uday Shukla, Mr. Rajesh Chavhan i/by Mr. Rahil Siddiqui for the Applicant in all Bail Applications.
Ms. Rutuja A. Ambekar, APP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2-State. Mr. Huma A. Shaikh h/f Eram P. Siddiqui for Respondent No.3 in BA/1773/2024 and BA/1838/2024.
Mr. Sameer Mujawar, API, DCB, CID, Unit-3, Mumbai.
CORAM: MANISH PITALE, J. DATE : 18th JULY 2024
P.C. :
. In these applications, the applicant is the same person and he is seeking bail in the context of three different FIRs registered against him, essentially on the basis of similar allegations.
bipin prithiani
2
914-ba-1773.24 & ors.doc
MANISH PITALE, J.
Mohammad Sheru Shaikh Maksood
The State of Maharashtra
Manish Pitale
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court