Sachin Mhalu Avhad v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application adjourned at the request of the learned APP, who sought time to give intimation to the victim; matter posted for a further date.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
38-ba-2569-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.1594 OF 2024
Sachin Mhalu Avhad ... Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Ms. Kajal Upadhyay with Nagesh Ahvad I.by SBG, for the applicant. Ms. Geeta Mulekar, APP, for the Respondent / State.
Digitally
signed by
VARSHA
VARSHA DEEPAK
DEEPAK GAIKWAD
GAIKWAD Date:
2024.11.14
10:52:26
+0530
CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR, J. DATE : 12TH NOVEMBER, 2024.
PC:
- The learned APP seeks time to give intimation to the victim.
- Place this matter on 26th November 2024.
(ANIL S. KILOR, J)
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Sachin Mhalu Avhad
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
Anil S. Kilor
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
17 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court