Salman Kayyum Shaikh v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application noting trial delays despite a prior direction to conclude trial within six months; prosecution has listed additional witnesses. Court adjourned for the State's instructions and listed the application for a later date.
What the court decided
bipin prithiani
1
913-ba-1352.24.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1352 OF 2024
… Salman Kayyum Shaikh Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Mr. Sudeep Pasbola, Senior Advocate, a/w Rohin R. Chauhan, Shubham G. Chinmay Godse, Rajan G., Swaraj S. Ramprasad D. i/by Prajyot Kumar Srivastava for the Applicant. Mr. Tanveer Khan, APP for Respondent-State.
CORAM: MANISH PITALE, J. DATE : 11th DECEMBER 2024
P.C. :
. In this application, attention of this Court is invited to order dated 23rd August 2023 passed in the second bail application of the applicant, wherein it was recorded that 8 witnesses were already examined during the course of trial and that 9 more witnesses were proposed to be examined. In that light, the application was disposed of with direction to the trial Court to conclude the trial preferably within 6 months. It is brought to the notice of this Court that more than a year has passed since the said order and 8 more witnesses have been examined. But, as recently as on 22nd November 2024, the prosecution has given a list of 12 more witnesses to be examined.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Salman Kayyum Shaikh
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
Manish Pitale
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
30 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court