Juber Aayub Shaikh v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application adjourned after counsel for the applicant initially failed to appear; a court-appointed advocate was assigned to assist and copies were to be served, with counsel later appearing.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
19-BA-1342-2024 (LAC).doc
Arjun
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO.1342 OF 2024
Juber Aayub Shaikh …Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra …Respondent
Ms. Pooja Phagnekar, appointed for the Applicant. Mr. Gaurav Pandey, for the Applicant.
Mr. S. S. Chaudhari, APP, for the Respondent-State.
Mr. S. S. Gawali, A.P.I., Vairag Police Station, District-Solapur, present.
CORAM : MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED : APRIL 16, 2024
P.C.:
1. This matter is listed at Serial No.19 on today’s board. The matter was called out in the morning session. However, as none appeared for the Applicant in the morning session, the same was kept back in the afternoon session. In the afternoon session also none appears for the Applicant.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Juber Aayub Shaikh
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
Madhav J. Jamdar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
15 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court