Bibhishan Ganpat Deshmukh v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application filed through prison; court heard the APP and requested the High Court Legal Services Committee to appoint an advocate for the applicant, adjourning the matter.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2-BA1328-2024.DOC
Santosh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1328 OF 2024
SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI
Digitally signed by SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2024.04.02 10:39:21 +0530
Bibhishan Ganpat Deshmukh ...Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra …Respondent
...Applicant
Mr. R. M. Pethe, APP for the State/Respondent No.1.
CORAM: N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATED: 1st APRIL, 2024
PC:-
1. Heard the learned APP.
- This application is preferred through prison. The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, is requested
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Bibhishan Ganpat Deshmukh
- respondent
State of Maharashtra
Coram
N. J. Jamadar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
16 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Glenford Wenceslaus D'Souza vs Ceasar Antonio D'Souza (Deceased)
Melanie Bernard Rodriques Nee Melanie Peter Dsouza vs Peter Augustine Dsouza Alias Peter a. Dsouza Alias Dsouza Peter Augustine
Balaso Shamrao Patil Vs Roshan Ashok Gade and Anr.
M/S Sadbhav Engineering Ltd. Throu. Its Chief Executive Officer and Ors. Vs Suwarna Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. Throu. Its Director and Ors.