Disposed¶25

Shabbit Ahamad Shagir Ahamad Shaikh v. State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC3 Apr 2024BA/1325/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Shabbit Ahamad Shagir Ahamad Shaikh v. State of Maharashtra; Bombay High Court, Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction; Bail Application No. 1325 of 2024; S. M. Modak, J.; order dated 7 May 2024; earlier bail rejected 7 July 2023 with six-week liberty clause; trial Court rejection 16 February 2024; case now committed; Section 307 IPC; no examination report of Police vehicles; spot panchanama; new ground for bail; matter stood over to 19 June 2024 after reopening with roznama; Manor Police Station, Palghar; advocates Advait Tamhankar (Applicant) and H.J. Dedhia (APP for State).

What the court decided

AI extract

Shabbit Ahamad Shagir Ahamad Shaikh vs State of Maharashtra — Bombay HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

PALLAVI MAHENDRA WARGAONKAR

¶2

10-BA-1325-2024.doc

¶3

Digitally signed by PALLAVI MAHENDRA WARGAONKAR Date: 2024.05.08 18:04:00 +0530

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

BAIL APPLICATION NO.1325 OF 2024

¶6

Shabbit Ahamad Shagir Ahamad Shaikh ...Applicant

¶7

vs.

¶8

State of Maharashtra ...Respondent

¶9

*****

¶10

Mr. Advait Tamhankar:	Advocate for Applicant.
Mr. H.J. Dedhia:	APP for State.
PSI Mr. Sumedh Medhe:	Manor Police Station, Palghar.

¶11

*****

¶12

CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J. DATE : 7^th MAY 2024

¶13

P. C. :-

¶14

1. It is true that this Court has already rejected the bail application

¶15

of this Applicant on 7^th July 2023 (page 189). Liberty was granted to pray for bail if the trial will not commence in six weeks. Applicant have taken chance before the trial Court. However, it was rejected on 16^th

¶16

February 2024 (page 197). Learned trial Court observed the case is not

¶17

committed. Now, it is commited as submitted by the learned APP.

¶18

2. Let the matter be fixed after reopening. By that time, place copy

¶19

of roznama.

1/2

Pallavi

10-BA-1325-2024.doc

3. Learned Advocate Mr. Tamhankar tried to submit that offence under Section 307 of IPC is not made out. There is no examination report of the Police vehicles. It is one of the material to assess the damage. Another material is spot panchanama.

¶24

4. Learned APP seeks time to address the Court. However, this has to be seen whether it is new ground for bail.

¶25

5. Stand over to 19^th June 2024 .

¶26

2/2

¶27

Pallavi

Shabbit Ahamad Shagir Ahamad Shaikh v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Shabbit Ahamad Shagir Ahamad Shaikh v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Shrishail Chandram Gaikwad Vs State of Maharashtra

Gulshan Pindidas Mehra Vs Krishna Vishwajeet Brahmachary Alias Krishna Sudhasmoy Banergee

Omprakash@Babloo@Arun Vishwanath Prasad Shrivastav vs the State of Maharashtra

Shivaji Dagadu Sul Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Gorakh Baburao Mhatre vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Sanjeev v. Deshpande Vs Intelligence Officer and Ors.