The applicant sought bail in a case involving robbery and conspiracy. The Court noted matching fingerprints and recovery of money, finding sufficient incriminating material and rejecting the bail application.
null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
42-BA-1215-24.DOC
Sayali Upasani
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1215 OF 2024
Jumman Shah Suleman Shah @ Jumman Kalya
...Applicant
Vs. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Mr. Anurag Agarwal i/b Narendra Kalpoth, for the applicant. Mr. Pankaj P. Deokar, APP for State-Respondent.
CORAM:- ANIL S. KILOR, J. DATED:- 14th AUGUST, 2024
PC:-
1/2
42-BA-1215-24.DOC
finger prints obtained from the scene of the occurrence match with the finger prints of the applicant. Furthermore, there is recovery of about Rs.6,00,000/- from the applicant.
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there is sufficient incriminating material to prima facie connect the applicant to the alleged offences?
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Jumman Shah Suleman Shah @ Jumman Kalya
The State of Maharashtra
Anil S. Kilor
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
