Dismissed
Altaf Maheboob Qureshi v. the State of Maharashtra and Another
Bombay HCBA/1046/2024
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:17187
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
939 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1046 OF 2024 ALTAF MAHEBOOB QURESHI
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Shaikh Mujtaba Gulam Mustafa. APP for Respondent-State : Mr. S. B. Narwade.
Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. Bhosale Sanjaykumar B. (Appointed through Legal Aid).
CORAM : S. G. MEHARE, J. DATE : 07.08.2024
PER COURT :-
learned APP for the respondent-State and learned counsel for respondent No.2, the Court expressed disinclination to grant bail. The learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions,
seeks leave to withdraw the bail application.
Committee, Aurangabad do pay the legal fees to advocate Bhosale as per the schedule.
vmk/-
ALTAF MAHEBOOB QURESHI
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
S. G. MEHARE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court