Disposed

Ankush Bhagwantrao Gore v. Shekhar Bhagwantrao Gore

Bombay HC13 Jun 2024ARP/58/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Arbitration petition under Section 11 seeking appointment of a fresh arbitrator after the earlier court-appointed arbitrator recused himself. The court appointed a sole arbitrator and set terms covering disclosure, fees, venue at Pune, interim applications and completion within one year.

What did the court decide?

Dr. Smt. Justice Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi (Retd.) appointed Sole Arbitrator; proceedings to resume from current stage, seat Pune, disposal within one year.

Ankush Bhagwantrao Gore vs Shekhar Bhagwantrao Gore — Arbitration | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

1 34-ARP-58-2024.doc

¶2

Digitally signed by MULEY MULEY SHUBHAM SHUBHAM PRAVINRAO PRAVINRAO Date: 2024.07.11 18:17:45 +0530

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 58 OF 2024

¶4

Ankush Bhagwantrao Gore … Petitioner

¶5

V/s.

¶6

Shekhar Bhagwantrao Gore … Respondent

¶7

Mr. Hemant Ghadigaonkar a/w Ms. Soniya for the Petitioner.

¶8

Mr. Anurag Jain i/by A. J. Associates for the Respondent (through VC).

¶9

CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J. DATE : 11th JULY, 2024

¶10

P.C.:-

¶11

This is a Petition filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of an Arbitrator since the Arbitrator who was earlier appointed by this Court has recused himself to the factum of the appointment per se. As there is no objection per se to the appointment of an Arbitrator, I appoint Dr. Smt. Justice Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi (Retd.) to act as an Arbitrator.

¶12

TERMS OF APPOINTMENT

¶13

(a) Appointment of Arbitrator : Dr. Smt. Justice Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi (Retd.) is hereby nominated to act as a Sole Arbitrator to decide the disputes and differences between the parties.

1/4

Shubham

2 34-ARP-58-2024.doc

(b) Communication to Arbitrator of this order :

¶18

(i) A copy of this order will be communicated to the learned Sole Arbitrator by the Advocates for the Applicant within one week from the date this order is uploaded.

¶19

(ii) The Advocates for the Applicant will forward an ordinary copy of this order to the learned Sole Arbitrator at the following postal and email addresses:

¶20

Arbitrator/s Dr. Smt. Justice Shalini

¶21

Phansalkar-Joshi (Retd.)

¶22

Address Bungalow No.12, Bhagya Chintamani Society, Opposite Kachra Depot Paud Road, Kothrud, Pune – 400411.

¶23

Mobile 9657188676

¶24

Email [email protected]

¶25

(c) Disclosure : The learned Sole Arbitrator is requested to forward, in hard copy or soft copy (or both), the necessary statement of disclosure under Section 11(8) read with Section 12(1) of the Arbitration Act to Advocates for the parties as soon as possible. The Advocates for the Applicant will arrange to file the original statement in the Registry. If the statement is forwarded in soft copy, a print out of the covering email is also to be filed in the registry.

¶26

(d) Appearance before the Arbitrator : Parties will appear before the learned Sole Arbitrator on such date and at such place as the

2/4

Shubham

3 34-ARP-58-2024.doc

learned Sole Arbitrator nominates to obtain appropriate directions in regard to fixing a schedule for completing pleadings, etc.

¶31

(e) Contact/communication information of the parties : Contact and communication particulars are to be provided by both sides to the learned Sole Arbitrator. The information is to include functional email addresses and mobile numbers.

¶32

(f) Section 16 application : The respondent is at liberty to raise all questions of jurisdiction within the meaning of section 16 of the Arbitration Act. All contentions are left open.

¶33

(g) Interim Application/s :

¶34

(i) Liberty to the parties to make an interim application or interim applications including (but not limited to) interim applications under Section 17 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 before the learned Sole Arbitrator. Any such application will be decided in such manner and within such time as the learned Sole Arbitrator deems fit.

¶35

(ii) The learned Sole Arbitrator is requested to dispose of all interim applications at the earliest.

¶36

(h) Fees : The arbitral tribunal’s fees shall be governed by the Bombay High Court (Fee Payable to Arbitrators) Rules, 2018.

¶37

(i) Sharing of costs and fees : Parties agree that all arbitral costs and the fees of the arbitrator will be borne by the two sides in equal shares in the first instance.

3/4

Shubham

4 34-ARP-58-2024.doc

(j) Consent to an extension if thought necessary . Parties immediately consent to a further extension of up to six months to complete the arbitration should the learned Sole Arbitrator find it necessary.

¶42

(k) Venue and seat of arbitration : Parties agree that the venue and seat of the arbitration will be in Pune.

¶43

It is made clear that the learned Arbitrator shall take sit and commence the arbitration proceedings from the stage that they are presently at. It is also made clear that the Application filed under Section 17 by the Respondent shall be heard and disposed of by the learned Arbitrator upon entering reference.

¶44

Noting the fact that the arbitration commenced in the year 2015, the Tribunal is requested to ensure that the same is disposed of within a period of one year from the date of a copy of this order is uploaded.

¶45

The Petition is accordingly disposed of.

¶46

(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.)

¶47

4/4

¶48

Shubham

Ankush Bhagwantrao Gore v. Shekhar Bhagwantrao Gore

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ankush Bhagwantrao Gore v. Shekhar Bhagwantrao Gore

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Sushama Sengstschmid Daughter of Digambar Ramchandra Tanksale vs Digambar Ramchandra Tanksale Alias Tanksale Digambar Ramchandra

Innovations Garment Pvt. Ltd. vs Kashyap Rathod Proprietor of Aastha School Uniform

Maredia Resorts Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai vs Mumbai International Airport Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai and Ors.

Johnson and Johnson Pvt. Ltd. vs Anil Kumar Sole Proprietor of Anil Traders

Space Master Realtors vs Mulund Sandhyaprakash Chs Ltd.

Supreme Vasai Bhiwandi Tollways Private Limited through Irp Rajesh Lihala vs State of Maharashtra through Office of Executive Engineer PWD Thane