Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the arbitration petition before the appropriate court in light of an arbitration clause designating Goa as the seat. Court granted permission.
Permission granted to withdraw the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1 36 ARP 47-24.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO.47 OF 2024
Aman Midha .. Petitioner
Versus
Tulip Diagnostics Pvt Ltd & Ors. .. Respondent …
Adv.Harjot Singh Alang i/b Raval Shah & Co. for the Petitioner. Adv.P.V. Samant for respondent.
CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATED : 27th MARCH, 2024
P.C:-
1 On being confronted with the arbitration clause contained in the subject document, where it is specified that the seat and venue of the arbitration shall be Goa, the learned counsel seek permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to file the same before the appropriate Court.
Permission granted. Petition stands disposed off as
withdrawn.
( SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.)
Ashish
Aman Midha
Tulip Diagnostics Pvt Ltd & Ors.
Bharati Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
