The court notes the investigation is complete and the charge sheet is imminent. Finding no specific necessity for the applicant's custody after she rendered cooperation, the court confirms the existing anticipatory bail order.
Confirmation of order dated 6/04/2023; no necessity for continued custody.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1 1 ABA -2491-22.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2491 OF 2022
Aruna Sanjiv Dube
.. Applicant
Versus
State of Maharashtra and anr. .. Respondents
Adv. Murtuza Najmi, Aqsa Tajuddin for the applicant. Ms. Mahalaxmi Ganpathy, APP for the respondent-State. Adv. Ridhima Mangaonkar for Intervenor. Mr. D.N. Pawar, P.S.I., Kolsewadi, Police Station.
CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATED : 26th MARCH, 2024
P.C:-
1 As directed by the previous order, the learned APP has obtained instruction from Mr. Pawar, the Investigating Officer of the subject C.R. He specifically make a statement that as directed by the Court, the applicant had reported to the police station and rendered her cooperation. On instructions Ms. Ganpathy, learned APP, make a statement that investigation in the subject crime is complete and the charge- sheet is likely to be filed within period of 10 days or so.
Since, no specific reason is coming from the Investigating Officer as to why despite the investigation being complete, the custody of the applicant is necessary, I deem it appropriate to confirm the order dated 6/04/2023.
( SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.)
Ashish
Aruna Sanjiv Dube
State of Maharashtra
Bharati Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
