Dattatray Kaluram Ghule v. Dyanamic Realty Enterprises
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought leave to withdraw an arbitration petition, noting no invocation against Respondents Nos. 4 and 5; the Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petitioner sought leave to withdraw an arbitration petition, noting no invocation against Respondents Nos. 4 and 5; the Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
71-ARP-27-2024.DOC
Shephali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 27 OF 2024
Dattatray Kaluram Ghule
…Petitioner
Versus
Dyanamic Realty Enterprises & Ors …Respondents
Mr Hemant Ghadigaonkar , for the Petitioner. Mr Jaydeep Deo , for Respondents Nos. 1 to 3.
SHEPHALI SANJAY MORMARE
Digitally signed by SHEPHALI SANJAY MORMARE Date: 2024.07.03 10:26:17 +0530
PC:-
CORAM: ARIF S. DOCTOR, J DATED: 2nd July 2024
(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J)
Page 1 of 1
Dattatray Kaluram Ghule
Dyanamic Realty Enterprises
Arif S. Doctor
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court