Anita Dineshkumar Gandhi v. Mr Vilas Kantilal Parmar
Case brief
What is this about?
Arbitration petition where the court found the affidavit of service inadequate and directed the petitioner to file a proper affidavit showing whether respondents had been duly served; matter adjourned.
What the court decided
Digitallysigned by 1 32-ARP 18-24.doc MUGDHA MUGDHA MANOJ MANOJ PARANJAPE PARANJAPE Date: 2024.07.12 14:32:31
+0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ARBITRATION PETITION NO.18 OF 2024
Anita Dineshkumar Gandhi … Petitioner V/s. Vilas Kantilal Parmar & Ors. … Respondents
Mr. Gaurav Nashikkar (through VC) a/w Mr. Sanjay Ranjane i/by Mr. Monish P. Jain for the Petitioner.
CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J. DATE : 11TH JULY 2024
P.C. :
- By an order dated 2nd May 2024 this Court was pleased to issue notice to the Respondents as also direct the Petitioner to serve Respondents by way of private service through all modes of communication.
- Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner has placed reliance upon an Affidavit of Service which is of two paragraphs and to my mind does not properly reflect as to whether the Respondents have been duly served. The Petitioner is therefore directed to file appropriate affidavit of service to show as to whether the Respondents have been duly served or not.
Mugdha
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Anita Dineshkumar Gandhi
- respondent
Vilas Kantilal Parmar & Ors.
Coram
Arif S. Doctor
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
12 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court