Arbitration petition stood over to 27 November 2024 after the respondent's counsel indicated the parties could amicably resolve their disputes, pending instructions from the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by MULEY MULEYSHUBHAMPRAVINRAO SHUBHAMPRAVINRAODate:2024.11.25 18:56:43 +0530
1 36-ARP-117-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 117 OF 2024
Chandan Mohanlal Mathrani
...Petitioner
Vs.
Chief Engineer Pune Zone
...Respondent
Mr. Yuvraj Narvankar for the Petitioner.
Mr. Kedar B. Dighe for the Respondent.
CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J. DATE : 25TH NOVEMBER, 2024
P.C.:-
of the Respondent submitted that it was possible to amicably resolve the disputes and differences between the parties.
Counsel for the Petitioner to take the necessary instructions.
(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.)
1/1
Shubham
Chandan Mohanlal Mathrani
Chief Engineer Pune Zone
Arif S. Doctor
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
