Adjournment order in an arbitration petition. The respondents' counsel sought time to file an affidavit in reply, having been served that morning. Reply directed to be filed and served by a fixed date, and the matter listed for further hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
47-ARP-112-2024.DOC
Shephali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 112 OF 2024
Chetan Chandrakant Arwade
…Petitioner
Versus
Laxmanrao & Vasudeorao Arwade Firm Through its …Respondents Partners
Ms Kalyani Mangre , i/b Manoj Patil, for the Petitioner. Mr Suryajeet Chavan , for the Respondents.
SHEPHALI SANJAY MORMARE
Digitally signed by SHEPHALI SANJAY MORMARE Date: 2024.12.16 18:39:12 +0530
CORAM: ARIF S. DOCTOR, J DATED: 16th December 2024
PC:-
(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J)
Page 1 of 1
Chetan Chandrakant Arwade
Laxmanrao & Vasudeorao Arwade Firm Through its Partners
Arif S. Doctor
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
