Arbitration petition under a Master Facility Agreement was withdrawn after the respondents regularized all due payments, leaving no subsisting dispute between the parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by MULEY MULEYSHUBHAMPRAVINRAO SHUBHAMPRAVINRAODate:2024.10.25 18:58:53 +0530
1 M1-ARBP-314-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 314OF 2024
Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Limited
...Petitioner
Vs.
Sadhika Engineering Works & Anr.
...Respondents
Adv. Khushil Shah a/w Jennifer Sanjana i/by Zerick Dastur Advocates for the Petitioner.
CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J. DATE : 24TH OCTOBER, 2024
P.C.:-
have since the filing of the present Petition regularized the payments which were due and payable to the Petitioner under the Master Facility Agreement. He submits that today there is no subsisting disputes. He thus seeks leave to withdraw the present Petition.
3. Petition is thus dismissed as withdrawn.
(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.)
1/1
Shubham
Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Limited
Sadhika Engineering Works
Anr.
ARIF S. DOCTOR
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
