In an arbitration petition filed post-award under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, the court dismissed the petition as infructuous because the first arbitrator's award was already upheld by the Supreme Court and execution proceedings were initiated, rendering the interim relief request unnecessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by MUGDHA MUGDHA MANOJ MANOJ PARANJAPE PARANJAPE Date: 2024.08.03 13:08:10 +0530
1 6-ARBP 102-24.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ARBITRATION PETITION NO.102 OF 2024
Rahul H. Bajaj … Petitioner V/s. Satco Capital Markets Ltd. & Ors. … Respondents
Ms. Sonal a/w Vivek M. Sharma i/by Vivek M. Sharma for the Petitioner.
Ms. Krushi N. Barfiwala, Rima Desai & Divyanshu Gupta i/by Parinam Law Associates for Respondent No.2.
Mr. Sameer Pandit a/w Sarrah Khambati, Rozat Akolawala i/by Wadia Ghandy & Company for Respondent No.3.
Mr. Sagar Divekar a/w Abhimanyu Mhapankar for Respondent No.4.
CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.
DATE : 2ND AUGUST 2024
P.C. :
Conciliation Act, 1996 post award.
has today submitted that the award in question has been upheld by the Hon’ble Supreme Court and the Petitioner has therefore initiated execution proceedings.
Mugdha
1 of 3
2 6-ARBP 102-24.doc
She however requests that the interim orders passed earlier be continued for a period of two weeks from today.
Mugdha
2 of 3
3 6-ARBP 102-24.doc
infructuous in the aforesaid terms.
(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.)
Mugdha
3 of 3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rahul H. Bajaj
Satco Capital Markets Ltd.
ARIF S. DOCTOR
As recorded by the court registry
14 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
