Hitesh Coal Traders v. Vaishnavi Rolling Mill Pvt. Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
Arbitration application in which respondents were absent despite service by registered A.D.; court directed applicant to serve a copy of the order within three weeks as a last chance and adjourned the matter.
What the court decided
Diksha Rane 23. ARBAP 86-24.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO.86/2024
M/s. Hitesh Coal Traders ... Applicant Versus Vaishnavi Rolling Mill Pvt. Ltd. … Respondents
Adv. Prajakta Gaonkar i/b. Adv. Rucha Jog for applicant. None for respondents.
CORAM : Rajesh S. Patil, J.
DATE : July 25, 2024.
P.C. :
1. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the respondents have been served by registered A.D.
2. None appears for the respondents when the matter is called.
3. As a matter of last chance in order to enable the respondent to appear in the matter, the applicant is directed to serve the copy of the today’s order, within a period of three weeks from today.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
M/s. Hitesh Coal Traders
- respondent
Vaishnavi Rolling Mill Pvt. Ltd.
Coram
Rajesh S. Patil
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court