Ekta Interiors v. Darshan Sagar Developer
Case brief
What is this about?
Arbitration application where the respondent was unrepresented; the court gave a last chance and adjourned the matter to 22 January 2025. No substantive decision was made.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed JYOTIPRAKASH by JYOTIPRAKASHPAWAR PAWAR Date: 2024.12.17 10:22:47 +0530
Jyoti Pawar 22. ARBAP 127.24.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO. 127 OF 2024
Ekta Interiors … Applicant V/s. Darshan Sagar Developer … Respondent _______________________________________ Mr. Vaibhav Jain i/b. Rignaya and Associates for the Applicant
CORAM : FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J. DATE : 14 December 2024.
P.C. : 1. The Resondent is not represented today.
- In order to give one last chance to the Respondent, stand over to 22 January 2025.
( FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J. )
1/1
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Ekta Interiors
- respondent
Darshan Sagar Developer
Coram
Firdosh P. Pooniwalla
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
11 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Jay View Co. Operative Housing Society Ltd. vs Solaris Developers Pvt. Ltd.
Surface Protection and Restoration Contractors Pvt. Ltd. vs Grand Paradi Co. Operative Housing Society Limited
Boston Institute of Analytics Global Educationh Pvt. Ltd. vs Educantum through Its Partner Vinayaka Poddar and Manish Poddar
Aditya Birla Finance Limited vs Mukesh Kumar Bansal