Arbitration application adjourned as arguing counsel was unavailable; the Court stood the matter over to 5th December 2024.
Adjournment order only; no substantive issue of general application decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
MUGDHA MANOJ PARANJAPE
1 31-ARBAP 108-24.doc
Digitally signed by MUGDHA MANOJ PARANJAPE Date: 2024.10.25 10:45:05 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO.108 OF 2024
Ashutosh Enterprises … Applicant V/s. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai … Respondent
Mr. Satyaprakash Sharma a/w Mrs. Harpreet Kaur Sethi a/w Neha Pandey i/by Global Juris for the Applicant.
Ms. Pooja Yadav for the Respondent-MCGM.
CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.
DATE : 24TH OCTOBER 2024
P.C. :
that the arguing counsel is unavailable and seeks some time in the matter.
(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.)
Mugdha
1 of 1
Ashutosh Enterprises
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
Arif S. Doctor
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
