Disposed

M/S Space Age Associates Power Infra Private Limited Thr. Director Shri. Vinayak Murlidhar Patil v. M/S. Skipper Engineers Thr. Its Partner Shri. Shailesh D Patil and Ors.

Bombay HC28 Nov 2024ARA/75/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Arbitration appeal withdrawn by the appellant at counsel's request with written instructions on record; interim applications disposed of and interim relief vacated; deposit transferred to executing court at Pune with all execution contentions left open.

What the court decided

AI extract

M/S Space Age Associates Power Infra Private Limited Thr… — Arbitration | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

16-ASWP-75-2024.DOCX

¶2

Amol

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

ARBITRATION APPEAL NO. 75 OF 2024

¶5

M/s Space Age Associates Power Infra Pvt Ltd thr. Director Shri Vinayak Murlidhar Patil …Appellant

¶6

Versus

¶7

M/s Skipper Engineers thr. its Partner Shri Shailesh D Patil & Ors …Respondents

¶8

Mr Pramod N Patil , i/b, Tukaram Shendge, for the Appellant.

¶9

Mr Virendra Tulzapurkar , Senior Advocate , with Manish Modak, for the Respondent No. 2.

¶10

AMOL PREMNATH JADHAV

¶11

Digitally signed by AMOL PREMNATH JADHAV Date: 2024.11.29 12:40:33 +0530

¶12

Mr Rahul Motkari , for the Respondent No. 1.

¶13

Mr Abhijit Desai , with Karan Gajra & Digvijay Kachare, for Respondent No. 3.

¶14

CORAM M.S. Sonak &

¶15

Jitendra Jain, JJ.

¶16

DATED: 28 November 2024

¶17

PC:-

¶18

Learned Counsel for the Appellant seeks leave to withdraw this appeal. The learned Counsel places on record the written instructions/resolution.

¶19

Accordingly, this appeal is disposed of as withdrawn. Interim Applications, if any, will not survive and are disposed of. Interim relief, in any, stands vacated forthwith.

¶20

Page 1 of 2

¶21

16-ASWP-75-2024.DOCX

¶22

The Appellant is at liberty to apply for refund of Court fees. If such application is made, the registry to dispose it of in accordance with the rules.

¶23

The amount deposited by the Appellant in this Court should now be transferred to the executing Court, i.e., concerned the District Court at Pune. Learned Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 state that execution applications are already been filed. They also submit that this deposit is not in accordance with the impugned award but they say that they will raise all these issues before the executing Court. All such issues are not being gone into by us and therefore, all contentions of all parties in this regard are kept open to be decided by the executing Court as and when raised in accordance with law and on their own merits. Learned Counsel for the 1st Respondent states that even the 1st Respondent would be filed an execution application.

¶24

(Jitendra Jain, J)

¶25

(M.S. Sonak, J)

¶26

Page 2 of 2

M/S Space Age Associates Power Infra Private Limited Thr. Director Shri. Vinayak Murlidhar Patil v. M/S. Skipper Engineers Thr. Its Partner Shri. Shailesh D Patil and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

M/S Space Age Associates Power Infra Private Limited Thr. Director Shri. Vinayak Murlidhar Patil v. M/S. Skipper Engineers Thr. Its Partner Shri. Shailesh D Patil and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

R G International vs Additional Director General Directorate of Revenue Intelligence

Shri Nitesh Patel vs the Union of India and Ors.

Global Exim vs the Union of India

Nirali Pankit Vora vs Union of India

Sourav Garg vs Union of India

Vikash Agarwal vs Union of India