The High Court in Criminal Application No. 423 of 2017 dismissed the application as infructuous since the trial court had already fixed the matter for judgment pronouncement during the pendency of the revision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by SATISH RAMCHANDRA SATISH SANGAR RAMCHANDRA SANGAR Date: 2024.01.16 17:37:46 +0530
14-APPR-423-2017.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION IN REVISION NO. 423 OF 2017 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION(ST)NO. 469 OF 2017
Sunil Shinde ...Applicant
vs.
The State of Maharashtra and Anr. …Respondents
Ms.Samrudhi Gholap i/b. Lawkhart Legal – Advocate for Applicant. Mr.A.D.Kamkhedkar – APP for Respondent No.1 – State.
CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J. DATE : 11th JANUARY 2024
P. C. :-
[S. M. MODAK, J.]
Satish Sangar
1/1
Sunil Shinde
The State of Maharashtra
S. M. MODAK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
