The State of Maharashtra v. Hemraj Mahadu Dalvi
Case brief
What is this about?
Adjournment note in a State appeal admitted only for the Section 498-A IPC offence. The court discovered the judgment had been dictated in error as covering Sections 498-A and 306, declined to sign it, and kept the matter for the next day.
What the court decided
- Apeal 152 of 2015.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 152 OF 2015
The State of Maharashtra ...Appellant vs. Hemraj Mahadu Dalvi ...Respondent
Mr. A. D. Kamkhedkar - APP for the Appellant-State Ms. Vilasini Balasubramanian – Appointed Advocate for the Respondent
CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J. DATE : 29th JANUARY, 2024
P. C. :-
1. In fact this appeal was heard on 10/01/2024 and Court has also dictated the judgment in open Court on that date. The dictation was given as if the appeal was admitted for the offence punishable under Sections 498-A and Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code. In fact neither APP nor the counsel for Respondent has brought to the notice of the Court that in fact the appeal is admitted only for the offence punishable under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code as per Order dated 22/01/2015.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
The State of Maharashtra
- respondent
Hemraj Mahadu Dalvi
Coram
S. M. Modak
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court