1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
Anticipatory bail application allowed in terms of prayer clause 'B'.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:7273
937-CRIAPPLN-937-7-24
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 935 OF 2024 IN
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 7 OF 2024
Kamal W/o Digmabar Chaudhari And Others … Applicants
VERSUS
Pradip Eknath Kulkarni And Others … Respondents
Mr. V.S. Tanwade, Advocate for Applicants
Mr. V.D. Sapkal, Senior Advocate i/b Mr. N.S. Ghanekar, Advocate for Respondent No.1
Mr. A.R. Kale, APP for Respondent No.3 – State
[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.]
DATE : 04th APRIL, 2024
ORDER :
is allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’.
2 Learned advocate for applicant is permitted to assist
learned Additional Public Prosecutor.
[ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ] JUDGE
S.P. Rane
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicants.
Kamal W/o Digmabar Chaudhari
Pradip Eknath Kulkarni
Nitin B. Suryawanshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
