The High Court at Aurangabad considered an anticipatory bail application where the applicant sought permission to withdraw after arguments on merits. The court granted permission to withdraw and dismissed the application as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the application; the application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:7274
937-ABA-7-24
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 7 OF 2024
Pradip Eknath Kulkarni … Applicant
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Another … Respondents
Mr. V.D. Sapkal, Senior Advocate i/b Mr. N.S. Ghanekar, Advocate for Applicant
Mr. A.R. Kale, APP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 – State Mr. V.S. Tanwade, Advocate for Intervenors
[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.] DATE : 04th APRIL, 2024
ORDER :
was not inclined to grant relief, learned advocate for the applicant, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the application.
2. Permission granted.
3. Application is dismissed as withdrawn.
[ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ] JUDGE
S.P. Rane
1 issue framed by the court
Whether permission should be granted to withdraw the anticipatory bail application after arguments.
Pradip Eknath Kulkarni
The State Of Maharashtra
Nitin B. Suryawanshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
