A one-line procedural entry in a criminal application; no decision was taken. The court merely noted counsel for the appellant and respondent and scheduled proceedings after the Christmas vacation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 58 OF 2024
In
STAMP NO. OF
Xyz ....PETITIONER
V/S
The State Of Maharashtra Thr. Pso, Ps, Karanja....RESPONDENT Lad (city) Dist. Washim And Another
PARESH SURESHSINGH THAKUR for Petitioner APP FOR R 1 for Respondent
CORAM : HON'BLE JUSTICE URMILA JOSHI PHALKE J DATE : 10th December, 2024
P.C. :
Mr Paresh S Thakur Adv for the appellant. Ms Anshula Paunikar Adv h/f Mr S V Sirpurkar Adv for R.no.2. S.O. after Christmas Vacation.
( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL )
Page 1/1
Xyz
The State Of Maharashtra Thr. Pso, Ps, Karanja Lad (city) Dist. Washim
Urmila Joshi Phalke
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
