A criminal application before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, was listed for notice. The court directed the applicants to supply spare copies within two weeks for serving the respondents and issued notice returnable on a fixed date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1)
1071- Cri. Appln. No. 3494-2024.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
1071 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3494 OF 2024
Javeedkhan Rashidkhan Pathan And Others
….Applicants
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Another
…..Respondents
Advocate for Applicants : Mr. B.R. Warma A.P.P. for Respondent/State : Mr. A. D. Wange
CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI AND ROHIT. W. JOSHI, JJ.
DATED : DECEMBER 06, 2024
ORDER:-
( ROHIT W. JOSHI ) (SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI ) JUDGE JUDGE
Y.S. Kulkarni
Javeedkhan Rashidkhan Pathan And Others
The State Of Maharashtra
Another
Vibha Kankanwadi
Rohit W. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
