Anticipatory bail application allowed based on application prayers permitting learned advocate to assist the prosecutor.
Application allowed in terms of prayer clause 'B'.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:8318
35-CRIAPLN-334-24
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.334 OF 2024 IN
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 12 OF 2024
Goraksh S/o Vishwanath Sangale … Applicant
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Another … Respondents
Mr. N.B. Narwade, Advocate for Applicant Mr. C.V. Bhadane, APP for Respondent No.1 – State Mr. Shashikant E. Shekade, Advocate for Respondent No.2
[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.]
DATE : 22nd APRIL, 2024
ORDER :
is allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’.
2 Learned advocate for applicant is permitted to assist
learned APP.
[NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ]
JUDGE
1 of 1
S.P. Rane
Goraksh S/o Vishwanath Sangale
The State Of Maharashtra
Nitin B. Suryawanshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
