Applicant in an anticipatory bail matter sought permission to assist the prosecution. The court allowed the application, permitting the applicant to assist the learned APP.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:8158
930-.1APPLN-1121-2024
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1121 OF 2024 IN ABA/281/2024
Hitendra Walmik Nikam (Patil)
.....Applicant
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Others .....Respondents
Ms. Megha Mali h/f. Mr. V.S. Patil Advocate for Applicant Mr. A.R. Kale ,APP for State Mr. N.N. Desale, Advocate for respondent No. 2 and 3
[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.]
DATE : 19th APRIL, 2024
ORDER :
is allowed.
[NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.]
Bhagyawant Punde
Hitendra Walmik Nikam (Patil)
The State Of Maharashtra
Respondent No. 2
Respondent No. 3
Nitin B. Suryawanshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
