Application under Section 482 CrPC pending while the applicant's trial in S.C.C. No. 105 of 2020 reached final-argument stage; the court held inherent powers should not be exercised at that stage and disposed of the application without keeping it pending.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:26130-DB
cria-25.21
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
68 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 25 OF 2021
SIDDHANT ALIAS SIDDHU S/O. SUBHASH DUDHE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Mr. Devang R. Deshmukh Advocate for Applicant. Ms. P.R. Bharaswadkar, A.P.P. for Resp. No.1.
CORAM: SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI AND S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, JJ.
DATE : 21st OCTOBER, 2024
ORDER :
cria-25.21
2
Code of Criminal Procedure. No need to keep the matter pending.
[S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR] [SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI] JUDGE JUDGE
asb/OCT24
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the court should exercise inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC when the underlying trial is at the fag end and listed for final arguments?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Siddhant alias Siddhu s/o. Subhash Dudhe
The State of Maharashtra
Vibha Kankanwadi
S.G. Chapalgaonkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
