The High Court declined to exercise inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to quash criminal proceedings, noting that the trial was in its final stages and the applicants had faced the trial during the pendency of the application. The criminal application was disposed of without interference.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:26129-DB
cria-149.20
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
66 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 149 OF 2020
SHIVLING S/O. PIRAJI MACHINWAR AND OTHERS VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
... None present for Applicants. Mr. A.R. Kale, A.P.P. for Resp. No.1. Mr. Rahul M. Jade Advocate for Resp. No.2.
CORAM: SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI AND S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, JJ.
DATE : 21st OCTOBER, 2024
ORDER :
cria-149.20
2
inherent powers under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. No need to keep the matter pending.
[S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR] [SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI] JUDGE JUDGE
asb/OCT24
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Court should exercise its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to quash the proceedings pending at the final stage of trial.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shivling S/o. Piraji Machinwar
State of Maharashtra
Anr
Vibha Kankanwadi
S.G. Chapalgaonkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
