Pratap Hanumant Khot v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application of an applicant was adjourned for paucity of time to a later date, with any interim order continuing until then.
What did the court decide?
Any interim order in force continued till next date.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Board Sr.No.:-0
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
CR. APPLICATION NO. 209 OF 2024
In
Criminal Bail Appln. 2226 OF 2022
Pratap Hanumant Khot ....APPLICANT V/S
State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT
CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR J DATE : 29th November, 2024
P.C. :
Due to paucity of time, stand over to 04/12/2024. Interim order, if any, to continue till then.
( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )
Page 1/1
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Pratap Hanumant Khot
- respondent
State Of Maharashtra
Coram
Anil S. Kilor
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Icici Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Smt. Sonali Sandeep Ravan and Ors.
Icici Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Shri. Sunil Shankar Ravan and Anr.
Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation Palghar Depot vs Nayanesh Ramakant Kini and Anr.
Shri. Ulhas Ramchandra Naik and Ors. vs Shri. Uday Ashok Khare and Anr.