Sushila Tulsankar and Ors. v. the State of Maharasthra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Interim order in an application concerning twin DV Act proceedings and non-compliance of maintenance orders between mother-in-law and daughter-in-law. With the private respondent absent, the court appointed a legal aid advocate to represent her and adjourned the matter.
What the court decided
22-APPLN-143-2024.doc
Prasad Rajput (P.A.)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 143 OF 2024
Sushila Tulsankar and Ors. .. Applicants Versus State of Maharashtra and Anr. .. Respondents
Versus
State of Maharashtra and Anr.
- Mr. Vishal V. Rankhambe a/w Ms. Aparna V. Rankhambe, Advocate for Applicant.
- Ms. Manisha R. Tidke, APP for Respondent-State.
CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : DECEMBER 11, 2024
P.C.:
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Sushila Tulsankar and Ors.
- respondent
State of Maharashtra
- respondent
Respondent No. 2
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
24 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Machindra S/O Vithoba Vanjari Vs Smt. Vasantabai Narayan Vanjari and Others
Sayyad Sardar S/O Sayyad Ahmed Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Assistant Registrar, Co-Operative Societies, Pandharkawada and Ors.
Haji Ahemed Abdulla Halari Vs Pramod Vasant Banginwar and Others
Mehboob Saifan Balurgi vs State of Maharashtra