Allowed

Swapnil Dnyaneshwar Wetalkar v. State of Mah. Thr. Pso Ps Pulgaon Tah.Deoli Dist.Wardha

Bombay HC21 Oct 2024APPA/743/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Convicted under Section 302 IPC with co-accused for setting his wife ablaze, based on two consistent dying declarations. The court found an arguable case that the act was abrupt rather than pre-planned and suspended the sentence pending appeal.

What did the court decide?

Execution of substantive sentence suspended till disposal of appeal; release on P.R. bond of Rs. 50,000 with one solvent surety.

Swapnil Dnyaneshwar Wetalkar Vs State of Mah… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

1 34appa743.2024..odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.

¶3

CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPA) NO. 743 OF 2024 IN

¶4

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 420 OF 2024

¶5

(Swapnil Dnyaneshwar Wetalkar Vs. State of Maharashtra, thr PSO, PS Pulgaon, Dist Wardha )

¶6

- - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders

¶7

- - - - Mr. T.U. Thathod, Advocate for applicant.

¶8

Ms. Mayuri Deshmukh, APP for respondent /State.

¶9

CORAM : VINAY JOSHI & ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATED : 21-10-2024

¶10

Heard.

¶11

This is an application filed by accused No. 1 Swapnil seeking suspension of execution of sentence passed in Sessions Case No. 127/2012, by learned Sessions Judge, Wardha, whereby he has been convicted for offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

The applicant has been charged for committing murder of his wife Mrs. Ekta in furtherance of common intention with coaccused Ms. Rekha by setting her ablaze. Admittedly, there are no eye-witness to the incidence but the conviction is based on two dying declarations recorded on the very day i.e. 7.5.2012. On the day of occurrence, in the morning, the incident happened in their residential house in which Ekta sustained severe burns on which she was shifted to hospital.

¶13

The first declaration (Exhibit 204) was recorded at 10.20 a.m. by PW No. 10 PSI Ramesh Pohane followed by second declaration (Exhibit No. 178) recorded at 2.15 p.m. by PW No. 7 – the Executive Magistrate. Though the oral dying declaration was to

¶14

2 34appa743.2024..odt

¶15

the mother of deceased, however, the trial Court did not rely on the same. The evidence against the applicant Swapnil is about two dying declarations.

¶16

We have gone through both the dying declarations which are consistent on material point. The tenor of the dying declarations is at the instance of dispute between husband and wife. Applicant Swapnil was quarreling and beating his wife Ekta. At that time, coaccused Rekha arrived, poured kerosene at the person of Ekta and set her ablaze which proved to be fatal.

¶17

The applicant’s learned Counsel would submit that there is no material to infer that it was a pre-planned act of both the accused. It is submitted that there was usual quarrel between the husband and the wife. However, Rekha acted in a cruel manner abruptly by pouring kerosene and setting Rekha ablaze.

¶18

Prima facie, we could see that the submission can be one possible view from the material on record. Thus, the applicant has made out an arguable case. In the circumstances, we are inclined to exercise our discretion in favour of the applicant.

¶19

In view of above, the application is allowed.

¶20

Execution of substantive sentence passed against the applicant Swapnil passed in Sessions Case No. 127/2012, by Sessions Judge, Wardha, stands suspended till the disposal of the appeal.

¶21

In the meantime, the applicant shall furnish P.R. bond of Rs. 50,000/- with one solvent surety in the like amount.

¶22

(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (VINAY JOSHI, J.)

¶23

Belkhede

Swapnil Dnyaneshwar Wetalkar v. State of Mah. Thr. Pso Ps Pulgaon Tah.Deoli Dist.Wardha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Swapnil Dnyaneshwar Wetalkar v. State of Mah. Thr. Pso Ps Pulgaon Tah.Deoli Dist.Wardha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tusharkanti S/O Haridas Mukherjee Vs State of Mah., Thr. Its Secretary Ministry of Home Affairs , Mantralaya Mumbai and 4 Others

Sandeep Murlidharrao Bhakre (Husbund) Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. Pso, Civil Lines, Akola Tq. and Dist. Akola and Antohter

Dwarkabai Wo Damduji Dakhole Vs State of Maharashtra, Throught Its Superintendent of Police, Nagpur Rural Dist. Nagpur

Union of India, Central Rly. Gen. Manager, Mumbai Thr Dy. Chief Engineer, Central Rly. Const. Nagpu Vs Harichand Jagannath Khandelwal (Died) Thr. Lrs. Smt. Shantibai Wd/O Harichand Khandelwal and Others

Union of India, Central Rly. Gen. Manager, Mumbai Thr Dy. Chief Engineer, Central Rly. Const. Nagpu Vs Harichand Jagannath Khandelwal (Died) Thr. Lrs. Smt. Shantibai Wd/O Harichand Khandelwal and Others

Shrikant Bhaucharan Sonekar Vs State of Mah. Thr. Principal Secretary, Ministry of Home, Mantralaya, Mumbai and Another.