Aruna Rathi v. Sanjeev Sat Prakash Goyal and 10 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Adjournment order: the appeal board could not be taken up due to paucity of time and was stood over to the next date; earlier interim relief, if any, was continued.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Board Sr.No.:-0
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEALS NO. 98 OF 2024
In
INTERIM APPLICATION 3716 OF 2022
Aruna Rathi ....PETITIONER
V/S
Sanjeev Sat Prakash Goyal And 10 Ors. ....RESPONDENT
CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE B.P. COLABAWALLA & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, JJ DATE : 18th December, 2024
P.C. :
Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 05/02/2025 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date.
( ASSOCIATE )
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Aruna Rathi
- respondent
Sanjeev Sat Prakash Goyal
Coram
B.P. Colabawalla
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
35 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Tata Advanced Systems Ltd. vs Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Circle- 2(3)(1)
Global Exim vs the Assistant Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 17 1 Mumbai and Ors.
Supremus Lower Parel Premises Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly Known as Kidderpore Holding Ltd) vs the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Mumbai 8
Indira Rameshchandra Shah vs Sunil Jagmohandas Shah