Vitthal Chintaman Paradkar v. Reji Varghese S/O. P.J.Varghese
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal against an order granting summary possession of a Mumbai flat under a miscellaneous testamentary petition. The court admitted the appeal, accepted the appellant's undertaking not to alienate or encumber the flat, and stayed effect of the impugned order until 13th June 2024.
What did the court decide?
Effect of impugned order deferred till 13 June 2024; undertaking against alienation/encumbrance accepted; appeal admitted.
What the court decided
Digitally signed by MULEY MULEY SHUBHAM SHUBHAM PRAVINRAO PRAVINRAO Date: 2024.05.10 14:41:19 +0530
1 401-IA-1464-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL NO. 90 OF 2024
IN
MISC. TESTAMENTARY PETITION (L) NO. 12845 OF 2021
Vitthal Chintaman Paradkar … Appellant V/s.
Reji Varghese & Anr. … Respondents
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1464 OF 2024 IN
APPEAL NO. 90 OF 2024
Mr. Pradeep Thorat a/w Aniesh S. Jadhav for Appellant.
Mr. Samji Joseph i/by Uni Lex for Respondent No.1.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Should the impugned testamentary petition order directing delivery of possession of the flat be given effect pending hearing of the appeal?
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Vitthal Chintaman Paradkar
- respondent
Reji Varghese
Coram
Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
24 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court