Husband and in-laws sought quashing of an FIR. The informant was served but absent; a legal aid panel advocate was appointed for non-applicant no.2 and matters listed after four weeks, with an interim direction that the charge sheet not be filed without prior permission of the Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1809apl891.24
1
Order
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CRIMINAL APPLICATION [APL] NO. 891/2024. Pankaj Ashok Chikte. - VERSUSState of Maharashtra and another. CRIMINAL APPLICATION [APL] NO. 892/2024.
Maya Ashok Chikte and others. - VERSUSState of Maharashtra and another.
Office notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Shri H.V. Thakur, Advocate for Applicants. Ms N. Tripathi, A.P.P. for Non-applicant No.1.
CORAM : VINAY JOSHI AND VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 18, 2024.
Heard.
Rgd.
Order
1809apl891.24
2
Advocate from Legal Aid Panel is appointed to
protect the interest of non-applicant no.2. Secretary, High Court Legal Services Subcommittee, Nagpur to take necessary action in that regard.
JUDGE JUDGE
Signed by: R.G. Dhuriya (RGD) Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 19/09/2024 15:09:20 Rgd.
Pankaj Ashok Chikte
Maya Ashok Chikte and others
State of Maharashtra
VINAY JOSHI
VRUSHALI V. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
