Anmol S/O Prabhakar Palkar v. the State of Maharashtra Thr. Pso, Ps, Bibi, Tah. Lonar, Dist. Buldhana and 1

Bombay HC13 Jun 2024APL/823/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Quashing application against a charge sheet for rape and SC/ST Act offences based on an informant's allegation of a deceptive relationship. The court issued notice to the non-applicants, returnable on 13.06.2024, with the A.P.P. waiving notice for the State.

What did the court decide?

Notice issued returnable on 13.06.2024; trial Court restrained from framing charges against applicant until returnable date.

Anmol S/O Prabhakar Palkar vs the State of Maharashtra Thr… — Caste Atrocities | Bombay HC (2024)

0905apl823.24

Order

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

¶5

CRIMINAL APPLICATION [APL] NO. 823/2024.

¶6

Anmol Prabhakar Palkar.

¶7

- VERSUS-

¶8

State of Maharashtra and another.

¶9

Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.

¶10

Shri V. Rathi, Advocate h/f. Shri P.B. Patil, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri N. Joshi, A.P.P. for Non-applicant No.1.

¶11

CORAM : VINAY JOSHI AND VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ.

¶12

DATE : MAY 09, 2024.

¶13

Heard.

¶14

This is an application seeking to quash

¶15

charge sheet registered as Special Atrocities cAse No.117/2024 before the 2^nd District and Additional Sessions Judge, Mehkar, arising out of the first information report bearing Crime No.15/2024 registered by Bibi Police Station, District Buldhana for the offence punishable under Sections 376, 376[2][n], 506 of the Indian Penal Code and

¶16

Sections 3[1][w][i], 3[1][w][ii] and 3[2][va] of

Rgd.

Order

0905apl823.24

the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

¶22

The informant widow aged 26 years has lodged the aforesaid report. It is her case that she got acquainted with the applicant in the year 2019. The applicant has assured her that he would arrange to get benefits of certain government schemes. By giving such promise, the applicant developed love relationship. It is contended that the applicant administered some stuffing substance and had illicit sexual intercourse. He has also taken some obscene photographs of the informant and then for next 4 years established sexual relation by stating that he would make the photographs viral.

¶23

The applicant submits that it is a case of consensual relationship. He has produced several documents to show the intimate relationship.

¶24

Issue notice to non-applicants, returnable on 13.06.2024. Learned A.P.P. waives notice for Non-applicant no.1.

¶25

In the meantime, the trial Court shall

Rgd.

Order

0905apl823.24

not frame charges against the applicant till the returnable date.

¶31

JUDGE JUDGE

¶32

Signed by: R.G. Dhuriya (RGD) Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 13/05/2024 11:18:30 Rgd.

Anmol S/O Prabhakar Palkar v. the State of Maharashtra Thr. Pso, Ps, Bibi, Tah. Lonar, Dist. Buldhana and 1

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anmol S/O Prabhakar Palkar v. the State of Maharashtra Thr. Pso, Ps, Bibi, Tah. Lonar, Dist. Buldhana and 1

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Ghanshyam Rajendra Dhole vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. Pso Ps Malkapur Gramin (Rural) Tq.Malkapur Dist.Buldhana and Another

Gulabsing Gyansing Solanke (Father in Law) and 4 Anothert vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. Pso, Ps Asegaon,(Amravati Rural), Tq. Achalpur, Dist. Amravati and 1

Vandana Dnyaneshwar Thavkar vs State of Mah. Thr. Pso Rajapet Amravati City Tq. and Dist.Amravati and Another

Sheikh Bismiillah Sheikh Gafur and 3 Others vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. Pso Ps Nagpuri Gate Amravati Dist.Amravati and Another

Jagdish Maroti Meshram and Another vs the State of Mah. Thr. Pso, Ps Kuhi, Dist. Nagpur and Another.

Tushar Namdeo Bhilkar and Others vs the State of Mah. Thr. Pso, Ps Warora, Tah. Warora Dist. Chandrapur and Another.