Procedural order in a criminal application by Canara Bank and others against an inspector appointed under the Maharashtra Private Security Guards Act. Court permitted amendment to add original accused Nos. 2 and 3 as co-petitioners; respondent undertook no coercive steps.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
10-APL-694-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 694 OF 2024
Canara Bank And Ors. … Applicants Versus
The Inspector Appointed Under Section 16 of The Maharashtra Private Security Guards (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act and Ors. … Respondents
Mr. Kiran Bapat, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Srihari Saranathan i/b Primacy Legal LLP, for the Applicants .
Mr. Amardev J. Uniyal, for Respondent No.2.
Mr. Y. Y. Dabke, APP, for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.
DATED : 26th JUNE, 2024. P.C.
Liberty to amend the Petition to add original accused Nos. 2
and 3 as co-petitioners.
application be furnished to the Counsel for the respondents.
REKHA PRAKASH PATIL
Digitally signed by REKHA PRAKASH PATIL Date: 2024.06.27 16:56:35 +0530
1 of 2
Rekha Patil
10-APL-694-2024.doc
2 of 2
Rekha Patil
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Canara Bank And Ors.
The Inspector Appointed Under Section 16 of The Maharashtra Private Security Guards (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act
Respondent No.2 (unnamed)
Prithviraj K. Chavan
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
